Where is equals three filmed

Of critical importance is clarifying the legacy of the in famous case: Equals Three v. Jukin Media. Many people, understandably, believe Equal Three set a bad precedent for YouTubers because it went to a jury. But jury verdicts have absolutely no precedential value. So what happened? Why all this confusion? And what does this opinion say? The answers require a little bit of an explanation, but given its importance to the community, I hope you bear with me. Almost all Equals Three episodes involved discussing online videos.

In 18 of these episodes, Equals Three used 19 videos owned by Jukin without permission one Equals Three episode used two videos owned by Jukin. In order to stop Jukin from issuing these takedown notices, Equals Three decided to file a lawsuit. As many know, fair use is a context-sensitive inquiry that requires analyzing, weighing and balancing the four fair use factors together.

Those factors are: 1 the purpose and character of the use, including its commercial nature; 2 the nature of the copyrighted work; 3 the amount and substantiality of the portion used of the original; and 4 market harm. While certain factors, like the first fair use factor i. Despite this fact, the court found them to be creative — which disfavors fair use. The third fair use factor does not examine the amount used in isolation. Rather, this factor examines the relationship between the transformative purpose and the amount and substantiality used of the original to achieve that purpose.

If the amount and substantiality used is excessive in light of the purpose, this will cut against fair use. If the amount and substantiality used is reasonable in light of the purpose, this will favor fair use. This line should serve as a great mental guide for content creators on YouTube who engage in what they hope will be fair use. Videos that use excessive amounts of the original are, in my opinion, bad content because — at the very least — they demonstrate sloppy editing and pacing and — at worst —are horribly unoriginal.

Fourth Factor Market Harm : The fourth fair use factor examines whether the use will result in a substantially adverse impact to the potential market for the original and its derivative works a derivative work is where the original is used to create another work, like turning a book into a movie. Jukin argued numerous hypothetical market harms — each of which failed to demonstrate the existence of actual market harm.

On the sparse set was a chair, phone and lamp — with one camera filming her saying lines on the phone. The demeaning treatment came all because she asked to be paid the same as the men. She went from being the most coveted actress in the demographic to not even being able to get an interview with any press outlet. But one day, everything clicked. Using her name and face recognition, she plotted not a comeback, but a reinvention.

The actress was already guest-starring as a waitress named Ursula on "Mad About You" when the role of Phoebe came along and producers scrambled to create a connection.

The quick-witted actress' passion for fun and games launched her groundbreaking year career in television. Pull out your big hair and stroll down memory lane with these fun quotes from the star-studded cast. In the s, the actor seemed to have it all. But underneath, he was dealing with the greatest battle of his life. When the 70s rockstar ran into the former first lady at a restaurant, they struck up a decade-long bond that mixed business with pleasure.

By Rachel Chang.